SQS, however, throws a wrench in the works. I was initially very surprised by the paper’s description of SQS (the 2008 version). It said that a queue might hold 200 messages, but a client requesting 100 could randomly receive only 20. This is because, to provide low latency, SQS does a best-effort poll of a subset of its distributed servers and immediately returns whatever it finds. But don’t worry, the other messages aren’t lost. They sit on servers not checked in that round. But the price of this low-latency is that FIFO ordering isn’t guaranteed. The database handles this mess by making log records idempotent, and ensures that out-of-order or duplicate processing never corrupts data.
Олег Давыдов (Редактор отдела «Интернет и СМИ»)
First FT: the day’s biggest stories，更多细节参见Safew下载
Оказавшиеся в Дубае российские звезды рассказали об обстановке в городе14:52
，更多细节参见Line官方版本下载
Квартиру в Петербурге затопило кипятком после обрушения потолка20:57
ВсеПолитикаОбществоПроисшествияКонфликтыПреступность，推荐阅读体育直播获取更多信息